I-9 Errors May Now Carry Greater Consequences: What Employers Should Know About ICE’s Updated Compliance Standards

For U.S. employers, Form I-9 is often viewed as a routine onboarding document. Under updated enforcement guidance, however, omissions and errors that may once have been treated as correctable deficiencies can create more significant compliance and penalty exposure.

In March 2026, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) updated its official guidance on Form I-9 inspections and violations, identifying a broad range of deficiencies that may be treated as substantive violations. For employers hiring U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, employees on work visas, or any other work-authorized individuals, I-9 compliance is no longer simply a recordkeeping matter. It is a key component of workforce compliance and risk management.  

If your company needs assistance with an internal I-9 compliance audit, a remote onboarding procedure review, or an ICE inspection or other employment compliance matter, please contact the ILS team at contact@consultils.com.

What Is Form I-9, and Why Does It Matter to Every Employer?

Under the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), employers must verify the identity and employment authorization of every individual hired to work in the United States. This verification is documented through Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.

As a general rule:

• The employee must complete Section 1 no later than the first day of employment;

• The employer must complete Section 2 after examining the employee’s identity and work authorization documents, generally no later than the third business day after the employee begins work;

• For former employees, the employer must retain Form I-9 for at least three years from the date of hire or one year from the date employment ends, whichever is later.

Form I-9 obligations apply to all U.S. employers, not only companies that employ foreign nationals. Even when an employee is a U.S. citizen, the employer must properly complete and retain the required I-9 documentation.  

How Does an ICE I-9 Inspection Work?

ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) generally initiates an I-9 inspection by serving an employer with a Notice of Inspection (NOI). Employers typically have at least three business days to produce the requested Forms I-9.

HSI may also request supporting business records, such as payroll documentation, lists of current and former employees, corporate formation documents, and business licenses. These materials can be used to compare the company’s I-9 records against its actual hiring and payroll practices.  

Where HSI identifies technical or procedural failures, employers generally receive at least ten business days to correct them. Substantive violations, or technical violations that are not timely corrected, may result in a Notice of Intent to Fine (NIF) and potential monetary penalties.  

Which I-9 Errors Present the Greatest Risk?

ICE’s updated guidance identifies numerous deficiencies that may constitute substantive violations. As a result, employers should not assume that an incomplete form can simply be corrected later without consequence.

Examples of higher-risk deficiencies include:

• Failing to prepare or produce a Form I-9 when required;

• Failing to complete Section 1 or Section 2 within the required timeframe;

• Missing or incorrect employee information, including legal name, date of birth, immigration status, A-Number, I-94 information, or employment authorization expiration date;

• Missing employee or employer signatures and dates;

• Failing to properly examine or record acceptable identity and employment authorization documents;

• Failing to timely complete reverification when an employee’s temporary work authorization expires;

• Using electronic I-9 systems, electronic signatures, or remote document examination procedures that do not comply with DHS requirements.

ICE may consider several factors when determining penalties, including the size of the business, the employer’s good-faith compliance efforts, the seriousness of the violations, whether unauthorized workers are involved, and the employer’s compliance history. These factors may increase or decrease the base penalty amount by up to 25 percent.  

Remote Onboarding and Electronic I-9 Procedures Require Particular Care

As remote hiring and distributed workforces become increasingly common, many employers rely on electronic I-9 systems or remote document examination procedures. These methods may be convenient, but they do not reduce the employer’s compliance obligations.

Electronic preparation, retention, reproduction, and signature procedures must comply with applicable DHS requirements. Similarly, remote examination of employee documents is generally available only to employers that qualify for a DHS-authorized alternative procedure, which typically requires participation in E-Verify and compliance with additional requirements.

An employer that uses remote document examination without satisfying the applicable requirements may face substantive violation findings. For businesses with remote employees, multi-state workforces, or electronic onboarding systems, I-9 risk may arise not because employees lack work authorization, but because the company’s verification process or document retention practices are inadequate.  

What Should Employers Do Now?

As ICE places greater emphasis on I-9 accuracy and procedural compliance, employers should consider incorporating I-9 review into their routine HR compliance practices.

1. Review Existing I-9 Records

Employers should consider auditing Forms I-9 for current employees, as well as former employees whose forms remain within the mandatory retention period. Particular attention should be paid to missing signatures, missing dates, incorrect status selections, incomplete document information, untimely reverification, and use of outdated form versions.

When an error is identified, employers should not erase entries, conceal changes, or backdate forms. Any correction should be completed in accordance with applicable I-9 correction procedures and should preserve a clear record of the amendment.

2. Add a Review Step to the Onboarding Process

Many I-9 deficiencies originate during the first days of employment. Employers should consider requiring a trained HR professional or authorized representative to review Section 1 after completion by the employee and before proceeding with Section 2. An early review can prevent routine onboarding errors from remaining in company records for years.

3. Evaluate Electronic and Remote Verification Procedures

Employers using electronic I-9 platforms or remote document examination should confirm that their systems and procedures satisfy applicable rules concerning electronic signatures, document retention, audit trails, and DHS-authorized alternative procedures. Convenience should not come at the expense of compliance.

4. Address Compliance Issues Before an ICE Inspection

Once an ICE inspection begins, the employer’s ability to correct deficiencies may be limited. Conducting an internal review, training responsible personnel, and maintaining consistent procedures before receiving an NOI may help reduce penalty exposure and demonstrate good-faith compliance efforts.

Conclusion

Form I-9 may appear to be a routine onboarding form, but it reflects an employer’s legal obligation to verify employment eligibility. As ICE places greater emphasis on complete forms, compliant electronic processes, and properly administered remote verification procedures, employers should no longer treat I-9 preparation as a one-time administrative task.

A proactive review of existing records, onboarding procedures, and electronic or remote verification systems can help employers reduce audit exposure, avoid unnecessary penalties, and maintain a more reliable workforce compliance program.

If your company needs assistance with an internal I-9 compliance audit, a remote onboarding procedure review, or an ICE inspection or other employment compliance matter, please contact the ILS team at contact@consultils.com. We assist employers in identifying compliance risks and developing practical, defensible employment verification procedures.

Disclaimer: The materials provided on this website are for general informational purposes only and do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. You should not act or refrain from acting based on any information provided here. Please consult with your own legal counsel regarding your specific situation and legal questions.

---

As Managing Partner at ILS, Richard Liu ranks among the leading U.S. attorneys in corporate, employment, and regulatory law. He is known for crafting legal strategies aligned with clients’ business objectives and advising Fortune 500 companies, startups, and executives on corporate transactions, financing, privacy, and employment matters across the technology, healthcare, and financial sectors.

Before founding ILS, Richard practiced at top defense firms, where he developed a reputation for anticipating risks and designing strategies that balance protection with growth. He has secured favorable outcomes in contract and intellectual property disputes, represented clients in state and federal courts, and is recognized for combining large-firm expertise with boutique-firm agility. Richard is also a frequent speaker at industry and legal conferences.

Email: contact@consultils.com | Phone: 626-344-8949